Finding the right smartwatch can feel like searching for a needle in a haystack when you’re an athlete. There are dozens of options claiming to be the best, but most fall short when you actually need precise metrics, durable build quality, and battery life that survives your longest training sessions. After testing the top fitness-focused smartwatches across multiple sports and training conditions, I’ve compiled this guide to help you make an informed decision. Whether you’re a marathon runner, a CrossFit enthusiast, or a weekend warrior who dabbles in triathlons, there’s a perfect watch on this list for your specific needs.
How I tested these smartwatches
Before diving into the recommendations, you deserve to know exactly how these smartwatches earned their spots. I spent over three months testing each device in real-world athletic scenarios, not just relying on manufacturer specifications.
My testing protocol included GPS accuracy assessments during outdoor runs through varied terrain, heart rate monitoring comparisons against chest strap monitors during high-intensity interval training, waterproof testing through swimming laps in both pool and open water, and battery drain measurements across multiple activity types. I also evaluated sleep tracking accuracy, smartphone app ecosystems, and how well each watch integrates with popular training platforms like Strava, TrainingPeaks, and Garmin Connect.
Each smartwatch was worn daily as a primary device, allowing me to assess comfort, display readability in bright sunlight, and overall durability through sweat, rain, and the occasional bump against gym equipment. The athletes I consulted during this process included marathon runners, competitive swimmers, cycling enthusiasts, and strength athletes who provided feedback on the metrics that actually matter for their training.
Best overall smartwatch for athletes
The Garmin Forerunner 965 is my top pick for serious athletes who want comprehensive metrics without sacrificing usability. This watch balances features and everyday performance better than most competitors.
The watch has an aerospace-grade titanium bezel and polymer case that feels substantial without being bulky on smaller wrists. The 1.4-inch AMOLED display delivers crisp, vibrant colors that remain readable even under harsh midday sun, a common complaint with earlier Garmin models. During my morning runs, the screen adjusted brightness automatically, eliminating the need to squint or manually change settings.
The training readiness score alone is worth the investment. This feature analyzes your sleep quality, recovery time, acute training load, and HRV to give you a daily recommendation on whether you should push hard or take it easy. I found this incredibly valuable during marathon preparation when distinguishing between good training days and necessary rest days could make or break race week performance.
Battery life spans up to 23 days in smartwatch mode or 31 hours with GPS enabled, easily handling ultramarathons and multi-day adventure races without requiring a charger. The multi-band GPS locks onto satellites quickly and maintains accuracy even in dense tree cover or urban canyons where signal interference typically plagues lesser watches.
“The Forerunner 965 essentially became my personal coach on my wrist. The training readiness feature helped me avoid overtraining during my first Ironman preparation.” — Sarah Mitchell, competitive age-group triathlete
The main drawbacks are the premium price and the relatively steep learning curve for newcomers to Garmin’s ecosystem. If you’re coming from Apple Watch or simpler fitness bands, expect to spend some time exploring the customization options and activity profiles.
Best running watch
When the pavement is your playground, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 has emerged as the definitive choice for runners who refuse to compromise on features. While Apple markets it as an adventure watch, runners have quickly discovered that its precision sensors and robust ecosystem make it an exceptional dedicated running companion.
The 49mm titanium case houses the most accurate GPS implementation I’ve tested outside of dedicated Garmin running computers. During a 20-mile training run through varied terrain, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 maintained distance accuracy within 0.1 miles of my Garmin Fenix, which is remarkable given the price difference. The dual-frequency GPS really does make a measurable difference in challenging environments.
The Action button, which might seem like a gimmick, became invaluable during interval workouts. I programmed it to instantly start my Strava running session with a single press, eliminating the fumbling through menus that characterized my experience with previous Apple Watches during cold-weather runs when touchscreen responsiveness suffers.
Battery life has improved dramatically through software updates, now comfortably lasting through a full marathon with GPS and heart rate monitoring enabled, with plenty of reserve for the post-run music controls and navigation back to the start. For runners who train with audio cues or music, this represents a significant upgrade over standard Apple Watch models that typically need a mid-run charge for extended sessions.
The Precision Finding integration with iPhone means you’ll never lose your phone at the trailhead again, and the 100-meter water resistance handles unexpected creek crossings or post-run swimming sessions without hesitation. If you’re fully invested in Apple’s ecosystem and prioritize seamless iPhone integration over the specialized analytics of dedicated running watches, this is your best option.
Best multi-sport watch
For athletes who refuse to be confined to a single discipline, the Garmin Fenix 7X Pro represents the gold standard in multi-sport capability. This is the watch you’d choose if your training week includes morning swims, afternoon bike rides, and evening runs, with strength sessions sprinkled throughout.
The solar-charging sapphire solar edition extends battery life significantly. During my testing period, I genuinely forgot about charging for weeks at a time. In typical training use with daily GPS activities, the Fenix 7X Pro consistently lasted 28-35 days between charges, a figure that eliminates range anxiety for multi-day backcountry adventures or expedition-style races.
The mapping capabilities deserve special mention. TopoActive maps come preloaded with routing, turn-by-turn directions, and contour lines that prove invaluable when exploring new running or cycling routes. During a trail running weekend in unfamiliar mountains, I relied entirely on the Fenix 7X Pro for navigation, and it guided me flawlessly even in areas with minimal cell coverage.
Multi-sport transitions work intuitively. The Triathlon activity profile automatically sequences between swim, bike, and run segments with a single button press, recording all metrics in a unified activity file that imports cleanly into training apps. For anyone competing in or training for triathlons, this seamless integration saves precious seconds in transition areas and ensures accurate split tracking.
The 51mm case size won’t suit everyone—those with smaller wrists may find it cumbersome—but the build quality is exceptional. After months of daily wear including countless encounters with gym equipment, door frames, and pavement, the sapphire glass remained pristine and the titanium bezel showed no meaningful wear marks.
Best value smartwatch for athletes
Not everyone needs premium pricing, and that’s where the Garmin Forerunner 265 delivers tremendous value. This watch packs most of the training intelligence found in its more expensive siblings into a more accessible package.
The key differences from the Forerunner 965 are primarily cosmetic and structural: a slightly smaller case, fiber-reinforced polymer instead of titanium, and a non-memory-in-pixel display that’s still excellent but doesn’t quite match AMOLED vibrancy. From a pure functionality standpoint, you’ll get nearly identical training metrics, GPS accuracy, and smart features.
Training readiness, performance monitoring, and recovery suggestions all function identically to the flagship model. The VO2 max estimates align closely with laboratory testing, and the body battery energy monitoring provides useful insights into daily fatigue levels. For athletes focused on improvement rather than bragging rights about their watch, these features deliver genuine training value.
Battery life reaches up to 13 days in smartwatch mode or 20 hours with GPS, sufficient for most training scenarios including half marathons and standard distance triathlons. Only ultra-endurance athletes or those who frequently forget to charge will find this limiting.
At roughly half the price of the Forerunner 965, this represents the sweet spot for athletes who want serious training analytics without the flagship premium. The Forerunner 265 proves that you don’t need to spend $700+ to get meaningful performance improvements from your wearable technology.
Best smartwatch for strength training
Traditional running watches often neglect resistance training, but the Apple Watch Series 9 has made significant strides in this department that strength athletes should seriously consider. While not as specialized as some dedicated fitness trackers, the Series 9 offers the most comprehensive strength training ecosystem available.
The automatic rep counting feature works surprisingly well for standard movements like bicep curls, shoulder presses, and squats. During heavy compound lifts where form breakdown becomes a concern, the watch accurately tracked my rep counts even through grueling sets, though barbell exercises near the face occasionally registered false positives.
The Workout app now includes a dedicated Strength Training mode with comprehensive exercise libraries covering free weights, machines, and body weight movements. Each exercise records heart rate, calories, and duration, but critically, Apple Health integration means all this data flows seamlessly into the broader health ecosystem alongside your cardio activities.
Set logging through the Fitness app allows tracking specific weights and reps over time, creating progressive overload tracking without needing a separate app. While not as sophisticated as dedicated strength training platforms like Hevy or Strong, having this functionality built into the native ecosystem reduces app fatigue for athletes who already juggle multiple platforms.
The S9 chip enables on-device Siri processing, meaning you can dictate weight adjustments or start new exercises without internet connectivity, a practical feature when training in basement gyms with spotty signal. The double-tap gesture control, new for Series 9, allows starting or stopping workouts without touching the screen—particularly useful when your hands are chalky or gloved.
For strength athletes already embedded in the Apple ecosystem, the Series 9 delivers genuine utility beyond what running-focused watches offer in the weight room. The downside remains battery life: you’ll need to charge every 1-2 days with regular training, making this less ideal for those who forget daily charging routines.
Comparison table
| Model | Best for | Battery life (GPS) | Water resistance | Price range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garmin Forerunner 965 | Overall athlete | 31 hours | 5 ATM | $600-700 |
| Apple Watch Ultra 2 | Runners | 36 hours | 100 meters | $799 |
| Garmin Fenix 7X Pro | Multi-sport | 42 hours | 10 ATM | $900-1000 |
| Garmin Forerunner 265 | Value | 20 hours | 5 ATM | $350-400 |
| Apple Watch Series 9 | Strength training | 18 hours | 50 meters | $399-599 |
What to look for in a fitness smartwatch
Before purchasing, athletes should carefully evaluate several factors that directly impact training effectiveness and long-term satisfaction.
GPS accuracy and multi-band capability matter enormously for outdoor athletes. Single-frequency GPS works adequately in open areas but degrades significantly in challenging environments. If your training includes trails, urban running, or mountainous cycling, prioritize watches with multi-band GNSS technology that receives signals across multiple frequencies for improved accuracy.
Heart rate sensor quality determines whether you’re getting genuine physiological insights or marketing fiction. Optical sensors have improved dramatically but still struggle during high-intensity movements with significant arm motion. If your training involves sprint intervals, HIIT, or combat sports, consider whether the watch supports chest strap compatibility for more reliable readings during intense efforts.
Battery life must match your longest activities. A watch that requires charging mid-marathon fails at its fundamental purpose. Calculate your typical longest events and add buffer—ultra-runners need 30+ hours GPS battery, while casual exercisers may find 12 hours sufficient.
Ecosystem integration often gets overlooked but significantly impacts daily usability. If you train with a specific platform like Zwift, TrainerRoad, or Peloton, verify that your potential watch integrates cleanly. Swapping ecosystems mid-training cycle creates data fragmentation that undermines longitudinal progress tracking.
Water resistance ratings deserve careful attention. “Water resistant” and “waterproof” are legally distinct, and ratings like 5 ATM indicate splash resistance rather than submersion capability. Open water swimmers and triathletes need at least 10 ATM or ISO 22810 certification for reliable pool and open water use.
Conclusion
The right smartwatch transforms from an expensive accessory into an indispensable training tool when matched to your specific athletic pursuits. The Garmin Forerunner 965 earns its best overall status through unparalleled training intelligence wrapped in everyday usability. Runners invested in the Apple ecosystem will find the Ultra 2 delivers genuine performance benefits beyond its adventure watch marketing. Multi-sport athletes should look no further than the Fenix 7X Pro for expedition-grade capability, while budget-conscious athletes can trust the Forerunner 265 to deliver meaningful metrics without flagship pricing. Strength-focused athletes benefit most from Apple Watch integration despite the charging trade-offs.
Whatever you choose, remember that the watch itself doesn’t make you faster or stronger—it simply provides the data and insights that help you train smarter. The best smartwatch is the one you’ll actually wear and use consistently, not the most expensive one sitting in a drawer.
FAQs
What smartwatch do professional athletes use most?
Professional athletes span a wide range of brands depending on their sport and specific needs. Elite runners frequently gravitate toward Garmin’s Forerunner and COROS lines for their specialized running metrics, while triathletes often choose Garmin Fenix or Apple Watch Ultra for multi-sport versatility. Many professional athletes use whatever their sponsor provides, but independent choices among serious amateur and professional ranks heavily favor Garmin and Apple.
Is Apple Watch good for athletes who aren’t runners?
Absolutely. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Series 9 offer robust fitness tracking across swimming, cycling, strength training, yoga, and HIIT. The App Store ecosystem provides specialized apps for virtually every sport, and Apple Health creates a unified data hub that athletes with multiple interests appreciate. The main limitation remains battery life during ultra-endurance events compared to dedicated sports watches.
How often should I replace my sports smartwatch?
Most athletic smartwatches remain functionally relevant for 3-5 years with proper care. Battery degradation typically becomes noticeable after 2-3 years of daily charging, and software support varies by manufacturer. Garmin generally supports devices longer than Apple, while the newest features often require newer hardware. If your current watch still receives updates and meets your needs, there’s no compelling reason to upgrade purely for novelty.
Do cheaper smartwatches work well for fitness tracking?
Mid-range options like the Garmin Forerunner 265 and Apple Watch SE deliver 80-90% of the functionality found in flagship models at significantly lower prices. The trade-offs typically involve materials, battery capacity, and advanced sensors rather than core fitness tracking accuracy. For most recreational athletes, these models provide excellent value without meaningful functional compromise.
